
Oil on canvas, 32×34.5cms.
I started The Conversation series in 2019 during the tumultuous time of Brexit and the Hong Kong protests. Perhaps it was circumstantial, but somehow it felt as if divisive forces had infiltrated my daily life. I felt on edge, worried about saying something that might insult someone or initiate an unintended heated debate. I often felt my opinions were inaccurately categorised and misunderstood. I worried about friendship and familial bonds cracking: I suspect many people felt the same.
Under these circumstances, I thought a lot about and began to solidify values of democratic governance, intellectual freedom, and moral equality in my mind. As an artist in the democratic world, I had assumed that my freedom of expression would continue to be a given. I would still like to assume as much, but lately it hasn’t felt that way.
Imagine my shock in reading about the Royal Academy’s action for pulling Jess de Wahl’s work from their shop. Here was an established and well regarded institution in the democratic West that I had admired and supported whilst living in London, seemingly unable to find a way to support multiple points of views. But even more shocking to me was the response of the students of the Royal Academy.
I struggled to rationalise the fallout from this expression of opinion and hoped that the Royal Academy would find a way to navigate this issue without setting the example that incompatible points of view would not be tolerated.
Having studied and practiced as an Art Psychotherapist, I began to observe the patterns of these types of disputes in conversations and tried to find ways to visually represent them. I really wanted to find a way to make them beautiful as a reminder that the goal of expressing different opinions, in my mind, should always be to listen and find a constructive resolution.
The Conversation: The Spaces Between, 2020 is available for sale through my website and can be viewed at Atelier do Tijolo.








